Case 3314323/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Locke v Blenheim Palace Heritage Foundation — 2024
- Case reference
- 3314323/2023
- Decision date
- 29 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Locke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Reading on 25, 26, 27, 28 and 29 November 2024 before Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto. In the written judgment record, the tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaints of direct disability discrimination and of failing to make reasonable adjustments.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of direct disability discrimination dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failing to make reasonable adjustments dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of discrimination arising from disability in respect of the claimant's dismissal succeeded; remedy was left to a later hearing. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.