Vol. I·6 May 2026

Search the index

Loading…

Loading page content.

Tribunal Watch

A structured, cross-cut index of UK employment tribunal decisions, built from the primary record at gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions. Independent of HMCTS and the Ministry of Justice.

Not legal advice. Information on this site is a matter of public record; it is not guidance on any individual case.

Editorial

About this site
Methodology
Corrections policy
Editorial standards

Rights & privacy

Open Government Licence v3.0
Privacy notice
Data subject requests
Atom feed (recent decisions)

Mrs C Burton-York v The Douay Martyrs Catholic Secondary School (R2) Roman Catholic Diocese of Westminster (R3) — Employment Tribunal 2020 | Tribunal Watch

Tribunal Watch/The Douay Martyrs Catholic Secondary School (R2) Roman Catholic Diocese of Westminster (R3)/3314332/2019

Case 3314332/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs C Burton-York v The Douay Martyrs Catholic Secondary School (R2) Roman Catholic Diocese of Westminster (R3) — 2020

Case reference: 3314332/2019
Decision date: 7 April 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Foxwell Date

Indexed: 26 April 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs C Burton-York

Respondent

The Douay Martyrs Catholic Secondary School (R2) Roman Catholic Diocese of Westminster (R3)

Claims brought

3 categories

Breach of contract
Race discrimination
Unfair dismissal

Source tags (gov.uk)

Breach of Contract
Contract of Employment
Race Discrimination and Unfair Dismissal

Outcomes per claim are extracted in a second pass and are not yet published on this page.

Source document

Primary record

The full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.