Case 3314334/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Traci-Gail Sayer v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 3314334/2021
- Decision date
- 25 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JUDGMENT The
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Miss Traci-Gail Sayer
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented in time. On the information before Employment Judge M Warren, the claimant's claims for unfair dismissal, holiday pay, unpaid wages, and failure to provide itemised pay statements succeeded.
The judgment did not determine the amount of compensation at that stage. It stated that the remedy to which the claimant was entitled would be determined at a Remedy Hearing, and that notice of that hearing would follow in due course.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to this as a claim for unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The judgment records success on the claim for failure to provide itemised pay statements. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.