Case 3314339/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Keech v The Red House Newport Pagnel Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3314339/2019
- Decision date
- 9 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Keech
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy notice dated 9 February 2020, the Tribunal gave Mr L Keech an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been reasonably pursued. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The judgment therefore records that the claim was struck out under rule 37. No substantive merits findings are given, and the text does not identify any award or other remedy. The decision is signed by Employment Judge Ord and sent to the parties on 3 June 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that 'the claim is struck out' under rule 37 because the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing after notice dated 9 February 2020. It does not separate outcomes between pleaded heads of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that 'the claim is struck out' under rule 37 because the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing after notice dated 9 February 2020. It does not separate outcomes between pleaded heads of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- not been reasonably pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.