Case 3314370/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M. Brady v Wells Maltings Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 3314370/2020
- Decision date
- 26 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McNeill QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M. Brady
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at Watford by CVP on 26 October 2021, Employment Judge McNeill QC held that Ms M. Brady’s claim for unfair dismissal against Wells Maltings Trust was well-founded and upheld it. The judgment records that the reasons were given orally at the hearing, with no written reasons to follow unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £2,527.66 in compensation. That sum was broken down as £1,927.66 for loss of earnings, £500 for loss of statutory rights, and £100 for expenses in seeking alternative work.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal claim and ordered compensation of £2,527.66, comprising £1,927.66 loss of earnings, £500 for loss of statutory rights, and £100 for expenses in seeking alternative work. | Upheld | — | £2,528 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,528
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,528
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.