Case 3314376/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Davey v Stratton Valley Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3314376/2019
- Decision date
- 21 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Davey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because Stratton Valley Limited did not present a response. Employment Judge Vowles therefore entered judgment in favour of Miss A Davey without a contested hearing.
The tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to unpaid wages and awarded her £1,188.00 in compensation for that head of claim. It also found that she was entitled to unpaid holiday pay and awarded £346.50 in compensation for that head of claim.
The total award was £1,534.50, comprising the two sums above. The listed hearing on 9 March 2020 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment entered under Rule 21 because the Respondent did not present a response. | Upheld | — | £1,188 |
| Holiday pay | Judgment entered under Rule 21 because the Respondent did not present a response. | Upheld | — | £347 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,535
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.