Case 3314387/2023 · Employment Tribunal
C Dias v Mainline security limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3314387/2023
- Decision date
- 10 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Cowen Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
C Dias
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out C Dias's claim against Mainline Security Limited. It recorded that, by a letter dated '1th November 2025' in the extracted text, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for failure to comply with tribunal orders dated 27 June 2024 and 12 September 2024, and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out. No monetary remedy was awarded and no further substantive findings on the underlying claim were set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was struck out after the claimant failed to comply with tribunal orders dated 27 June 2024 and 12 September 2024 and did not make sufficient representations, or request a hearing, in response to the Tribunal's letter. The extracted text states the letter was dated '1th November 2025', which appears inconsistent with the decision and order dates. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.