Case 3314390/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Scott v O’Hara Bros Surfacing Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3314390/2019
- Decision date
- 13 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Scott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 37 strike-out judgment, not a merits decision. By letter dated 30 October 2019, the Tribunal gave Mr W Scott an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order of 30 October 2019 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The hearing fixed for 30 January 2020 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Procedural strike-out under rule 37 for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 30 October 2019 and for not being actively pursued. The judgment does not identify any substantive claim labels in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.