Case 3314425/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Sofiane Amirouchen v Mr M Varda and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 3314425/2019
- Decision date
- 17 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr Sofiane Amirouchen
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Sofiane Amirouchen, appeared in person with an interpreter. None of the three respondents attended the hearing, despite notice being sent by email on 31 July 2020. The tribunal adjourned briefly to see whether the respondents could be contacted, but proceeded in their absence when no contact was made and the only telephone number on file was temporarily unavailable.
On the wages claim, the tribunal recorded that the claimant sought payment for 93.25 hours at £8 per hour. It also noted that Employment Judge Lewis had previously directed the first respondent to answer whether the claimant had worked 110 hours and been paid only for 17 hours, but no response was provided. In those circumstances, the tribunal found the claim for unauthorised deduction of wages well founded and awarded £746 gross, being 93.25 hours multiplied by £8.
On holiday pay, the claimant said he had worked for 3.5 weeks and the tribunal accepted his evidence that the first respondent had calculated his holiday entitlement at 13.5 hours. The tribunal found that the third respondent had failed to pay that entitlement and awarded £108 gross, being 13.5 hours multiplied by £8. The judgment does not record any separate award of interest or other sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim well founded and ordered the third respondent to pay the gross sum of £746. | Upheld | — | £746 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the third respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered the gross sum of £108. | Upheld | — | £108 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £854
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.