Case 3314439/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Arthur-Badoo v Maidstone and Tunbrige Wells NHS Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 3314439/2020
- Decision date
- 22 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Walker Members
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Ms E Rousou, Mr S Khan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Arthur-Badoo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at London South Employment Tribunal by CVP on 21 and 22 July 2022. The unanimous judgment was that Mr P Arthur-Badoo’s claims of discrimination on the grounds of race and age were not well founded and were dismissed. The respondent was Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust.
No written reasons were provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons is recorded in the decision. The extracted judgment therefore records only the dismissal outcome and does not set out the tribunal’s detailed findings or reasoning beyond the conclusion that the claims were not well founded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.