Case 3314444/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Neary v Peterborough City Council Four C’s Multi-Academy Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 3314444/2019
- Decision date
- 13 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Neary
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a short judgment in Mrs A Neary v Peterborough City Council and Four C’s Multi-Academy Trust, case 3314444/2019. The tribunal records only that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings of fact or law, and it does not make any merits determination on the underlying employment claims.
No remedy was awarded or calculated in the judgment. It does not identify separate findings for breach of contract or unfair dismissal, and it gives no further detail about the dispute beyond the withdrawal and dismissal order.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not separately identify the outcome of this head of claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not separately identify the outcome of this head of claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.