Case 3314473/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Lina Castillo v Ms Sujani Baddam and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3314473/2020
- Decision date
- 30 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Ms E Jones, Ms C Whitehouse
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs Lina Castillo
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Lina Castillo's case was heard at Reading on 7 and 8 June 2023 before Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto, sitting with Ms E Jones and Ms C Whitehouse. The claimant appeared in person and the respondents were represented by counsel. The written record identifies the claims as case numbers 3314473/2020, 3300883/2021, 3301440/2021 and 3301441/2021.
The written judgment records only a single outcome: the claimant's complaints were not well founded and were dismissed. No separate findings, liability analysis, or claim-by-claim reasoning is set out in the written record. It also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment, and no remedy findings are set out. On the face of the written record, all complaints identified in the case were dismissed in full.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written record only states that the claimant's complaints were not well founded and were dismissed; it does not set out separate reasons for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The written record only states that the claimant's complaints were not well founded and were dismissed; it does not set out separate reasons for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The written record only states that the claimant's complaints were not well founded and were dismissed; it does not set out separate reasons for this claim. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written record only states that the claimant's complaints were not well founded and were dismissed; it does not set out separate reasons for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written record only states that the claimant's complaints were not well founded and were dismissed; it does not set out separate reasons for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.