Case 3314482/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Carr — 2024
- Case reference
- 3314482/2022
- Decision date
- 12 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge King Members
- Venue
- Cambridge
- Panel members
- Ms Elizabeth, Ms Williams
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Cambridge by CVP over 10, 11 and 12 June 2024, with Employment Judge King and lay members Ms Elizabeth and Ms Williams. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Carr. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal upheld the claimant's detriment claims for having made a protected disclosure in part only: detriments (a) and (b) succeeded, but detriment (c) did not, under s47B(1) Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s47B(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.