Case 3314495/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. A James v Apple Retail UK Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3314495/2022
- Decision date
- 10 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. A James
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr A James's claim against Apple Retail UK LTD. The judgment records that, by letter dated 5 June 2023, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on whether the claim should be struck out because he had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 15 February 2023 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The tribunal found that the claimant either failed to make representations, or failed to make sufficient representations, as to why the claim should not be struck out, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out. The hearing listed for 21 September 2023 was vacated. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' being struck out and does not restate the claim type. 'Unfair dismissal' is taken from the listing context rather than the body of the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.