Case 3314497/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Bain, Solicitor For the v Ms C Summers, HR Officer Interpreter: Ms M Tzulik — 2022
- Case reference
- 3314497/2020
- Decision date
- 19 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Milner-Moore Members
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Ms E Bristow, Ms B Osbourne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Bain, Solicitor For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Reading on 9 and 10 May 2022 before Employment Judge Milner-Moore with members Ms E Bristow and Ms B Osbourne. The written judgment records that the claimant, Mrs B Krzysztoforska, was represented by Mr D Bain and the respondent by Ms C Summers, with interpretation by Ms M Tzulik.
The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim was well founded and that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent. It also upheld the wrongful dismissal claim, recording that the dismissal was in breach of contract. The claim for unpaid holiday pay under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 succeeded.
The direct race discrimination claim under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 was not upheld, and the victimisation claim under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010 was also not upheld. The written record does not set out the tribunal's reasoning beyond these stated outcomes.
The judgment is a short written record of the decision and notes that the reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. No monetary award or breakdown is recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination claim under s.13 Equality Act 2010 was not upheld. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation claim under s.27 Equality Act 2010 was not upheld. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal stated that the dismissal was in breach of contract. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.27 Equality Act 2010
- regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.