Case 3314501/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Unite the Union v Monarch Aircraft Engineering Ltd (In administration) and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3314501/2019
- Decision date
- 14 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Unite the Union
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment concerned an application for reconsideration in the proceedings brought by Unite the Union against Monarch Aircraft Engineering Ltd (in administration) and the Secretary of State for BEIS. Employment Judge R Lewis allowed the application and reinstated the proceedings.
The tribunal did not determine the underlying protective award or redundancy issues in this document. Instead, it made case-management directions for the next stage of the proceedings.
Unless a party showed cause in writing by 21 January 2022, the matter was to be determined on the papers without a hearing. Each party was directed to send the tribunal, by the same date, a single indexed and paginated PDF containing its evidence and submissions on all issues to be decided.
If the matter proceeded on the papers, it was reserved to the same judge to be decided on the first available date after 24 January 2022. No monetary remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal allowed the application for reconsideration and reinstated the proceedings. No substantive merits decision or monetary award was made in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.