Case 3314514/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. A Torti v Silu Wellness Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3314514/2022
- Decision date
- 11 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. A Torti
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Postle recorded that a determination could properly be made on that basis and directed the claimant to serve a calculation of her financial losses and a witness statement by 27 June 2023.
The judgment records that the claim succeeds and that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. No monetary award is set out in this judgment, and no separate findings are given by pleaded claim type in the short judgment record.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined later, but it does not break down findings by pleaded category. | Upheld | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined later, but it does not break down findings by pleaded category. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined later, but it does not break down findings by pleaded category. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined later, but it does not break down findings by pleaded category. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined later, but it does not break down findings by pleaded category. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.