Case 3314516/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Aylett v Garden Logistics Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3314516/2019
- Decision date
- 10 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Aylett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Anstis determined the claims without a hearing. The tribunal found that Garden Logistics Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr O Aylett's wages and ordered payment of £1,404.47 as the gross/net sum due.
The tribunal also found that Mr Aylett was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £345.15. The listed hearing on 10 March 2020 was cancelled. No discrimination, unfair dismissal, or other compensatory heads of loss were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and was ordered to pay the gross/net sum of £1,404.47. | Upheld | — | £1,404 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £345.15. | Upheld | — | £345 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,750
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.