Case 3314516/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Shipley v The Vine Kitchen Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3314516/2022
- Decision date
- 19 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchings Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Shipley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. The order states that, by a letter dated 28 April 2025, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The judgment records that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment records only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. The working time classification is taken from the listing category in the prompt, not from detail in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The listing category in the prompt refers to a written pay statement claim, but the judgment text itself does not give details beyond the strike-out of the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.