Case 3314523/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Written representations v No Response served — 2020
- Case reference
- 3314523/2019
- Decision date
- 28 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Written representations
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant’s claims of unauthorised deductions from earnings and holiday pay were well-founded. It recorded that the claimant had not made a discrimination claim.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant for 60 hours of unlawfully deducted earnings in the net sum of £972 and for 65 hours of holiday pay in the sum of £975. The total sum payable was £1,947, to be paid within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found 60 hours of unlawfully deducted earnings, assessed in the net sum of £972. | Upheld | — | £972 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found 65 hours of holiday pay due, assessed in the sum of £975. | Upheld | — | £975 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,947
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.