Case 3314534/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Sharin Razzaghi v Reem Clothing Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3314534/2023
- Decision date
- 23 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Sharin Razzaghi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Watford Employment Tribunal on 23 June 2025, Employment Judge Alliott heard the claim brought by Ms Sharin Razzaghi against Reem Clothing Limited (in voluntary liquidation). The respondent did not attend. The judgment records three successful claims: unauthorised deductions from wages, breach of contract in respect of notice, and failure to pay holiday entitlement.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Ms Razzaghi the net sum of £381.60 for unauthorised deductions from wages, £1,526.40 for dismissal in breach of contract as to notice, and £190.80 for unpaid holiday entitlement. The judgment does not set out separate reasons beyond the orders made, and it does not record any discrimination, unfair dismissal, or redundancy finding. The total of the monetary awards is £2,098.80.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £382 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,526 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £191 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,099
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.