Case 3314560/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Mr A Rudenko — 2022
- Case reference
- 3314560/2020
- Decision date
- 1 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim for unpaid wages in the sum of £3,082.51. The tribunal recorded that her employment ended on 16 October 2020. Her final payslip showed £3,645.81, but she was paid only £563.30.
The respondent accepted that £3,082.51 was due but said the company had no income because of the pandemic. The tribunal noted that the company still existed, although the respondent said he was making plans to put it into an insolvency process.
Because the respondent admitted the wages were due in the amount claimed, the tribunal upheld the claim for unpaid wages and ordered payment of £3,082.51 within 28 days. The judgment does not record any separate award for interest or other remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as a claim for unpaid wages. The respondent agreed the sum was due but said the company had no income because of the pandemic. | Upheld | — | £3,083 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,083
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.