Case 3314564/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms Z Wroe, Solicitor — 2022
- Case reference
- 3314564/2020
- Decision date
- 13 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Cambridge by CVP on 28 February 2022, Employment Judge Tynan, sitting alone, struck out the claimant’s complaints against Northamptonshire County Council because they had no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms Z Wroe, solicitor.
The written record sent on 13 March 2022 does not set out separate factual findings or reasons for each individual head of complaint. It records only the global strike-out order and does not specify any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The 1-page judgment does not identify the factual particulars of this head; the claim type is taken from the case listing context supplied for the case. The tribunal struck out all complaints for having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The 1-page judgment does not identify the factual particulars of this head; the claim type is taken from the case listing context supplied for the case. The tribunal struck out all complaints for having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Other | This head is inferred from the case listing context as the 'time limits' issue. The written judgment does not give separate reasons for it and records only a global strike-out for no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The 1-page judgment does not identify the factual particulars of this head; the claim type is taken from the case listing context supplied for the case. The tribunal struck out all complaints for having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | This head reflects the case listing category for working time / written pay statement issues. The judgment does not break the complaints down individually and records only a global strike-out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.