Case 3314583/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Employment tribunal upholds unfair-dismissal claim against Mapps Group Ltd (in Voluntary Liquidation) & Others
The judgment does not set out the underlying merits reasoning; it simply records the success of the unfair dismissal claim. No remedy was assessed at this stage.
- Case reference
- 3314583/2019
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Holder
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge M Warren recorded that Miss C Holder’s claim of unfair dismissal succeeded against Mapps Group Ltd (in Voluntary Liquidation) & Others. The judgment does not set out the underlying merits reasoning; it simply records the success of the unfair dismissal claim.
No remedy was assessed at this stage. The tribunal stated that the claimant’s entitlement would be determined at a later Remedy Hearing, allocated one hour. The claimant was directed to file and serve a schedule of loss within 28 days of the order.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment recorded that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim succeeded. Remedy was not determined in this judgment and was listed for a later Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.