Case 3314583/2023 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr Z Grudziecki (2) Mr P Lichon v New Pro Foundries Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3314583/2023
- Decision date
- 15 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dick Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Mr Z Grudziecki (2) Mr P Lichon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge sitting alone at Watford on 29 September 2025 determined the first claimant's complaints in his absence of the respondent, which did not attend and was not represented. The judgment upheld three heads of claim brought by the first claimant, Mr Z Grudziecki: a statutory redundancy payment under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996, an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of accrued but untaken holiday pay equivalent to 14 days, and damages for breach of contract in relation to notice pay calculated on gross pay to reflect likely Post Employment Notice Pay tax treatment.
The respondent was ordered to pay the first claimant £9,600 as a redundancy payment, £1,680 for holiday pay and £5,400 as notice pay damages. The judgment notes that the first claimant is responsible for paying any tax or National Insurance on the holiday pay sum.
The Tribunal found there was insufficient evidence available to determine the second claimant's claim, and recorded that separate orders had been made about that matter. Written reasons were not provided with the judgment, on the basis that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Awarded to the first claimant under s.163 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £9,600 |
| Holiday pay | Unauthorised deduction from wages for 14 days of accrued but untaken holiday at the end of employment of the first claimant. | Upheld | — | £1,680 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for breach of contract in relation to notice pay, calculated on gross pay to reflect likely tax treatment as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £5,400 |
| Other | Second claimant's claim not determined by this judgment; insufficient evidence and separate orders made. Specific claim type not stated in this document. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,680
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.