Case 3314587/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D King v Reading Borough Council and and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 3314587/2019
- Decision date
- 24 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms D King
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 15 December 2019, the Tribunal gave Ms D King an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 24 August 2019 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37.
The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claims or any monetary award. It is a strike-out decision only, signed by Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto on 9 January 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded claim(s). It records that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 24 August 2019 and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.