Case 3314592/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Harris v Studio One Media Centre Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3314592/2020
- Decision date
- 14 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Harris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 14 September 2021, the tribunal gave Mr W Harris an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued and because the claimant had not responded to correspondence. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Tynan struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination on the merits of any underlying complaint and no monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant had not responded to correspondence. By letter dated 14 September 2021, the claimant was invited to make representations or request a hearing, but he did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.