Case 3314593/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Mills Mr M Hester Mr M Haselum v Monarch Aircraft Engineering Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3314593/2019
- Decision date
- 15 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Mills Mr M Hester Mr M Haselum
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment covers case numbers 3314593/2019, 3314594/2019 and 3314595/2019 brought by Mr R Mills, Mr M Hester and Mr M Haselum against Monarch Aircraft Engineering Limited. By letter dated 28 November 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations, or request a hearing, explaining why the claims should not be struck out on the basis that they had not been actively pursued.
The claimants did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Quill ordered that the claims be struck out. The judgment records the decision date as 9 January 2024 and that the judgment was sent to the parties on 15 February 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action in the extracted text; it records only that the claims were struck out because they had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.