Case 3314612/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Baron v Jaspers Catering Franchise Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3314612/2020
- Decision date
- 17 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Baron
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment because the Respondent did not present a response to the claim. Employment Judge Anstis therefore entered judgment in favour of Mrs L Baron on the papers.
The tribunal found that the Respondent owed the Claimant unpaid wages and awarded £1,600 in compensation. It also found that holiday pay had not been paid and ordered £1,169 as holiday pay.
In addition, the tribunal found a breach of contract and ordered the Respondent to pay £628 as compensation. The total monetary award on the face of the judgment was £3,397.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment says the Claimant was owed unpaid wages and was awarded £1,600 in compensation. | Upheld | — | £1,600 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment says the Respondent failed to pay holiday pay and ordered payment of £1,169. | Upheld | — | £1,169 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment says the Respondent breached the Claimant’s contract and ordered £628 in compensation. | Upheld | — | £628 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,397
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,397
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.