Case 3314658/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Anne (Annie) Brown v Mutual Group Ltd and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3314658/2021
- Decision date
- 18 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davey Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms Anne (Annie) Brown
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Cambridge via CVP before Employment Judge Davey, heard the claimant’s wage and holiday pay claims on 19 June 2023 and 7 September 2023. The claimant appeared in person on 19 June 2023 and did not attend the later hearing; the respondents were represented by Mr Ishmael Musah. The written judgment records that the claimant also applied to amend her claim to add MSI Recruitment Ltd and Charteris Management Ltd as respondents, and that application was dismissed.
On the substantive claims, the tribunal held that the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well founded and was dismissed. The tribunal also held that the claim for failure to pay accrued but untaken holiday pay on termination of employment was not well founded and was dismissed. The judgment records that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for failure to pay accrued but untaken holiday pay on termination of employment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.