Case 3314671/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Purwin v Vishnitz Girls School Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3314671/2020
- Decision date
- 15 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bansal Members
- Panel members
- Mr N Boustred, Mrs A Telfer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Purwin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent heard at Watford on 28 May 2024 before Employment Judge Bansal with lay members Mr N Boustred and Mrs A Telfer. The tribunal recorded that the parties agreed the terms of settlement for the claimant's complaints in these proceedings.
The respondent agreed to pay the claimant £7,000 without deduction in full and final settlement. The claimant confirmed that the settlement sum of £7,000 had been paid into her bank account.
No merits findings were made on the underlying complaints, and the judgment does not identify individual causes of action within the consent terms. The record is limited to the settlement reached and its payment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Judgment by consent recorded that the parties agreed a settlement of the claimant's complaints in these proceedings; the respondent agreed to pay £7,000 without deduction in full and final settlement. | Settled | — | £7,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.