Case 3314680/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Tyreman v Sprift Technologies Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3314680/2020
- Decision date
- 11 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Tyreman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment under the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. Employment Judge Anstis ordered the respondent, Sprift Technologies Limited, to pay the claimant, Mr N Tyreman, £573.26 as compensation for breach of contract. The judgment also recorded that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £888.62 for that claim.
The judgment does not set out further factual findings or a detailed reasons section. It therefore records only the two successful claims, the amounts awarded on each, and the resulting total of £1,461.88. The judgment was sent to the parties on 23 March 2021 and entered in the register on that date.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment ordered payment of £573.26 as compensation for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £573 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £888.62. | Upheld | — | £889 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,462
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.