Case 3314699/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Colteniuc v CR Consultancy Recruitment — 2024
- Case reference
- 3314699/2021
- Decision date
- 29 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Colteniuc
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37. In a letter dated 25 March 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 18 January 2024 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Graham Date ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying merits of the claim or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not state the substantive cause of action. The gov.uk listing for this case categorises it as unlawful deduction from wages, but that is not identified in the judgment text itself. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.