Case 3314702/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Polley v MPK Garages Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3314702/2021
- Decision date
- 13 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Polley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing on limitation and jurisdiction, not a merits judgment. For the claimant’s automatic unfair dismissal complaints, the tribunal found that the primary time limit ended on 17 March 2021, that it was not reasonably practicable to present the complaints within that time, and that it became reasonably practicable to do so on or about 30 June 2021. Because the complaints were presented on 22 August 2021 within a reasonable time after that date, the tribunal held that it had jurisdiction over them.
The tribunal also dealt with the disability discrimination complaints. It found that the last act of disability discrimination alleged was the dismissal on 18 December 2020, so the primary three-month time limit ended on 17 March 2021. The tribunal held that it was just and equitable to extend time for presentation of that complaint to 22 August 2021 and therefore had jurisdiction. It further held that, so far as any other disability discrimination claims were not part of an act extending over a period linked to dismissal, time should also be extended to 22 August 2021.
The respondent conceded, without prejudice to its position on knowledge of the disability and its effects, that the claimant was disabled within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 because of dyslexia, described in the judgment as a learning disability. No monetary award was made because the judgment was limited to preliminary issues and did not determine liability on the substantive claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal found the primary time limit for the claimant’s automatic unfair dismissal complaints ended on 17 March 2021, that it was not reasonably practicable to present them within time, that it became reasonably practicable on or about 30 June 2021, and that the complaints presented on 22 August 2021 were within a reasonable time. Jurisdiction was therefore found, but the merits were not determined. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal found the last alleged act of disability discrimination was the dismissal on 18 December 2020, that the primary time limit ended on 17 March 2021, and that it was just and equitable to extend time to 22 August 2021. It also held that any other disability discrimination complaints not part of an act extending over a period linked to dismissal were time-extended to that date, so jurisdiction was established. The respondent conceded that the claimant is disabled within section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of dyslexia, a learning disability, without prejudice to its case on knowledge of the disability and/or its effects. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- not reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.