Case 3314705/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend and was not represented For the v Miss Bithrey, Solicitor — 2023
- Case reference
- 3314705/2021
- Decision date
- 12 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend and was not represented For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Sarfaraz Rafiq, did not attend and was not represented. The respondent, Aspire Cuisine Limited t/a Papa Johns, was represented by Miss Bithrey, solicitor, at a hearing in Norwich by CVP on 25 May 2023 before Employment Judge Postle.
The judgment records that the respondents accepted that the total sum of £3,622.86 was due to the claimant in respect of unpaid wages, holiday pay and sick pay, and ordered them to pay that sum forthwith. The decision does not set out separate findings of fact, does not identify any legal test, and does not apportion the award between the different heads mentioned.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the respondents accepted £3,622.86 was due in respect of unpaid wages, holiday pay and sick pay. It does not state the underlying statutory basis or apportion the amount between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,623
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.