Case 3314719/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Musa v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 3314719/2021
- Decision date
- 25 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hanning
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms C Musa
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a costs judgment by Employment Judge Quill dated 8 April 2024, decided on the papers following an application by the Respondents dated 21 November 2023. The substantive claims were not determined in this judgment; instead, the Tribunal considered whether the Claimant should pay costs arising from the postponement of a preliminary hearing listed for 4 to 6 September 2023, which was adjourned after the Judge allowed the Claimant's late amendment to extend the asserted start date of employment back to 2001.
The Judge found that the Claimant had acted unreasonably within the meaning of Rule 76(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure by making the amendment application so late, which caused costs to be thrown away. The Judge considered the Claimant's ability to pay under Rule 84, noting her 2023 income of £50,371.73 against outgoings including £18,745 in legal fees for this dispute, and concluded she had the means to meet a costs order.
Exercising discretion, the Judge ordered the Claimant to pay £3,500 (inclusive of VAT) for counsel's fees thrown away, £3,000 (inclusive of VAT) for solicitors' costs, and £306.79 for R4's attendance, aggregating to £6,806.79. Payment was structured as an initial £2,810.79 by 31 May 2024 followed by 12 monthly instalments of £333.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This document is a costs judgment, not a substantive merits judgment. The Tribunal ordered the Claimant to pay the Respondents £6,806.79 in costs under Rule 76 following unreasonable conduct that caused the postponement of the September 2023 hearing. The underlying substantive claims (breach of contract, unlawful deduction of wages, race discrimination, working time) were not adjudicated in this document. | Other | — | £6,806 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,806
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 76 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
- Rule 84 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
- Rule 75(1)(c) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
- Oni v NHS Leicester City UKEAT/0133/14
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.