Case 3314728/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Miss Cameron (Solicitor). — 2021
- Case reference
- 3314728/2020
- Decision date
- 9 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr D Finch, brought a claim against Viridor Waste Management Limited alleging that he had been constructively unfairly dismissed under the Employment Rights Act 1996. The hearing took place by telephone before Employment Judge Postle on 15 June 2021.
The tribunal dismissed the claim without reaching the merits. It held that it had no jurisdiction because the claimant did not have sufficient qualifying continuous employment to bring an unfair dismissal claim. The judgment does not record any award or remedy because the claim failed at the jurisdictional stage.
The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the claim because it had no jurisdiction, finding the claimant had insufficient qualifying continuous employment under the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.