Case 3314743/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr John Maher v Touchstone Worktops Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3314743/2021
- Decision date
- 24 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr John Maher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Norwich by CVP on 27 to 30 June 2023, Employment Judge M Warren heard Mr John Maher's claims against Touchstone Worktops Limited. The written judgment records that the claims for unfair dismissal, notice pay, unpaid wages, holiday pay and breach of contract failed and were dismissed.
The record is brief and does not set out separate factual findings, legal tests, or any monetary award. It records only the dismissal of the claims and contains no remedy order.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The written record refers to notice pay and breach of contract together; classified here as breach_of_contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mapped from the judgment's reference to unpaid wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Mapped from the judgment's reference to holiday pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.