Case 3314761/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Asselin v Modern Networks Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3314761/2019
- Decision date
- 10 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Asselin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with Mr J Asselin's claim against Modern Networks Limited by considering whether it should be struck out. By a letter dated 7 February 2020, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out on the grounds that the proceedings had been conducted by or on behalf of the claimant in a scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious manner, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Ord struck the claim out.
No substantive liability findings or monetary award are recorded in the extracted judgment, and no remedy was ordered.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type or types. It records only that the claim was struck out because the proceedings had been conducted in a scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious manner and/or had not been actively pursued, after the claimant failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.