Case 3314764/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Dike v Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd Heard by Cloud video — 2021
- Case reference
- 3314764/2019
- Decision date
- 6 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Dike
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered a preliminary limitation issue in Mr B Dike's race discrimination claim against Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd. It held that the race discrimination claims which predated 13 December 2018 were presented out of time, and that it was not just and equitable for the tribunal to consider them.
The tribunal made no strike out or deposit order in relation to any element of the claims. It directed the claimant to serve an updated schedule of loss by 28 May 2021, and otherwise left the directions given on 15 June 2020 in force. The judgment recorded no substantive merits determination and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal held that the claimant's race discrimination claims predating 13 December 2018 were presented out of time and that it was not just and equitable for the tribunal to consider them. The judgment did not determine the substantive merits of any later claims. | Other | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.