Case 3314791/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Bafna v Weatherbys Bank Limited Heard: by CVP (Bury St Edmunds) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3314791/2020
- Decision date
- 21 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Brown Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Bafna
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing by CVP on 21 January 2022 before Employment Judge T Brown, the tribunal dealt with the claimant's complaints against Weatherbys Bank Limited. The tribunal first held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the claimant's complaint of a breach of the General Data Protection Regulation or the Data Protection Acts.
The claimant's breach of contract claim was then considered and was found not well-founded. That claim was dismissed. No monetary remedy was recorded in the judgment, and no written reasons were provided because none were requested at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the claimant's complaint of a breach of the General Data Protection Regulation or Data Protection Acts. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the breach of contract claim was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.