Case 3314809/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Allison v Miss N Watson — 2020
- Case reference
- 3314809/2019
- Decision date
- 20 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Allison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by telephone at Norwich on 15 May 2020 before Employment Judge Postle. The judgment records that the remote hearing was consented to by the parties and that a face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable, no party requested one, and all issues could be determined remotely.
The tribunal formally dismissed the claimant’s claims against the respondent for non-payment of wages, notice pay and holiday pay. The judgment states that the claimant confirmed the respondent had paid the sums due in full, and no monetary award or other remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as a claim for non-payment of wages; it was formally dismissed because the claimant confirmed the respondent had paid the sums due in full. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as a claim for notice pay; it was formally dismissed because the claimant confirmed the respondent had paid the sums due in full. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as a claim for holiday pay; it was formally dismissed because the claimant confirmed the respondent had paid the sums due in full. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.