Case 3314833/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Pilling v CareerXI Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3314833/2019
- Decision date
- 25 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Pilling
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Hyams found that CareerXI Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr S Pilling's wages and ordered payment of £3,118.28 gross. The tribunal also found that he was dismissed in breach of contract because he was not given any notice of termination, and awarded £767.12 in damages for the failure to give notice.
The tribunal further found a separate breach of contract in the respondent's failure to follow any procedure for dismissing the claimant, and awarded £328.77 in damages for that breach. It also found that accrued holiday pay had not been paid and ordered payment of £670.87. The awards together total £4,885.04.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,118 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £767 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £329 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £671 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,885
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.