Case 3314854/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Mukuvare v Geyser Thermal Energy Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3314854/2021
- Decision date
- 20 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Mukuvare
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the South East Employment Tribunals on 30 August 2021. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge R Lewis Date therefore determined the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered the respondent to pay £2,100 gross. It also ordered payment of £181.20 in relation to contractual expenses. The judgment does not set out any further findings, separate heads of compensation, or an interest calculation.
The judgment was dated 3 December 2021 and sent to the parties on 20 December 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. | Upheld | — | £2,100 |
| Other | Award made in relation to contractual expenses; the judgment does not specify a separate legal label for this item. | Upheld | — | £181 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,281
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.