Case 3314866/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Davis v Metroline Travel Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3314866/2020
- Decision date
- 27 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Davis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant was fairly dismissed by reason of conduct. On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed.
The tribunal also found that the respondent was entitled to dismiss the claimant summarily without notice. The breach of contract claim therefore failed and was dismissed. The judgment records that oral reasons were given at the hearing, with no written reasons included in the supplied decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states the claimant was fairly dismissed by reason of conduct and that the unfair dismissal claim fails and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the respondent was entitled to dismiss summarily without notice and that the breach of contract claim fails and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.