Case 3314868/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Umberto Raiola v Northumberland Park House Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3314868/2019
- Decision date
- 14 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Umberto Raiola
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment in Mr Umberto Raiola v Northumberland Park House Ltd heard at Watford on 13 January 2020 before Employment Judge Bedeau. The judgment records that, by consent, the respondent agreed to pay the claimant £3,000 by 4.00pm on Friday 14 February 2020 and to provide a factual reference when requested.
The claimant consented to the dismissal of his claim for compensation based on his withdrawal. The extracted text does not specify the legal basis of the underlying claim, so no merits finding is recorded in the judgment text provided. The disposition is therefore recorded as a withdrawal resolved by consent, with the agreed payment as the bottom-line figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Consent judgment. The extracted text does not identify the underlying statutory basis of the claim for compensation. The claimant consented to dismissal of the claim based on withdrawal after the respondent agreed to pay £3,000 and provide a factual reference when requested. | Withdrawn | — | £3,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.