Case 3314877/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J S Ghuman v Jordan Barnes (Securitas) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3314877/2020
- Decision date
- 2 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J S Ghuman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 4 December 2021, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or to request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated bases were that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 6 June 2021 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto therefore struck out the claim in the judgment dated 11 January 2022, sent to the parties on 2 February 2022.
The listed hearing fixed for 4 March 2022 did not take place. The reasons do not record any compensation, award, or substantive liability findings because the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The reasons refer to 'the claim' generically and do not separate the pleaded heads; this classification follows the case listing context supplied with the file. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The reasons refer to 'the claim' generically and do not separate the pleaded heads; this classification follows the case listing context supplied with the file. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The reasons refer to 'the claim' generically and do not separate the pleaded heads; this classification follows the case listing context supplied with the file. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.