Case 3314889/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Vigne v British Telecommunications plc — 2021
- Case reference
- 3314889/2019
- Decision date
- 1 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Panel members
- Dr C Whitehouse, Ms C Bailey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Vigne
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Reading by video hearing, heard the case from 11 to 14 January 2021 before Employment Judge Anstis with Dr C Whitehouse and Ms C Bailey. The claimant was represented by counsel and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The written judgment records only that the claimant's claims are dismissed. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the applicable period. No monetary remedy is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states that the claimant's claims are dismissed but does not set out reasons or separately identify each claim in the judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as disability discrimination; the written record states that the claimant's claims are dismissed but gives no written reasons. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as breach of contract; the written record states that the claimant's claims are dismissed but gives no written reasons. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.