Case 3314936/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Jose Henrique Baptista De Macedo v City Recycling and Storage Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3314936/2023
- Decision date
- 15 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchings Representation
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jose Henrique Baptista De Macedo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, employed as Operations Manager from 28 March 2022 to 24 November 2023, brought a complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of his unpaid November 2023 net wages of £2,719.24. The respondent did not attend the hearing. The Employment Judge, having satisfied herself that notice of the hearing had been properly served under Rule 56 and having considered Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, proceeded in the respondent's absence after the clerk attempted to contact the respondent by telephone without success.
On the evidence, including the claimant's payslip and contemporaneous messages from the respondent's then-contact promising payment once cash flow improved, the Tribunal found that the November 2023 wages had not been paid. The Tribunal also found that clause 14.2 of the employment contract required the claimant to give one week's notice of termination and that, by his own admission, he did not do so.
The complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was therefore well-founded. The Tribunal awarded the claimant three weeks' pay of £2,039.43 (calculated from the November pay of £2,719.24 at a weekly rate of £679.81), with the respondent responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claimant sought November 2023 net wages of £2,719.24. Tribunal found the deduction well-founded but reduced the award by one week's pay (£679.81) because the claimant did not give the contractual one week's notice, resulting in an award of £2,039.43. | Upheld | — | £2,039 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,039
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 56 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.