Case 3314944/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Johnston v Sears Property Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3314944/2019
- Decision date
- 1 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Panel members
- Ms F Betts, Mr P Hough
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Johnston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Reading by CVP on 1 September 2020 before Employment Judge Anstis, Ms F Betts and Mr P Hough. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr D Sear, a director of the respondent.
The written record contains no substantive findings of fact or legal reasoning. It records only that the claimant's claims were dismissed.
The judgment also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record. On the face of the written decision, no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The written record states only that the claimant's claims were dismissed and does not give separate reasons for this claim. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | The written record states only that the claimant's claims were dismissed and does not give separate reasons for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written record states only that the claimant's claims were dismissed and does not give separate reasons for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.